Today At Monticello

  • 58° Sunny
  • Sun 70° / 49°
  • Mon 77° / 55°
  • Tue 80° / 55°
  • Wed 76° / 56°

View full forecast

Today’s Hours

Gates are open from 8:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. First tour, 9 a.m.; last tour, 6:40 p.m.

Learn more
TJE Original Title: 
Thomas Jefferson and Slavery

Thomas Jefferson was a consistent opponent of slavery throughout his life.[1]   He considered it contrary to the laws of nature that decreed that everyone had a right to personal liberty. He called the institution an "abominable crime," a "moral depravity," a "hideous blot," and a "fatal stain" that deformed "what nature had bestowed on us of her fairest gifts."

Early in his political career Jefferson took actions that he hoped would end in slavery's abolition. He drafted the Virginia law of 1778 prohibiting the importation of enslaved Africans. In 1784 he proposed an ordinance banning slavery in the new territories of the Northwest. From the mid-1770s he advocated a plan of gradual emancipation, by which all born into slavery after a certain date would be declared free. As historian David Brion Davis noted, if Jefferson had died in 1785, he would be remembered as an antislavery hero, as "one of the first statesmen anywhere to advocate concrete measures for eradicating slavery." After that time, however, there came a "thundering silence." Jefferson made no public statements on American slavery nor did he take any significant public action to change the course of his state or his nation.

Countless articles and even entire books have been written trying to explain the contradictions between Jefferson's words and actions in regard to slavery. His views on race, which he first broadcast in his Notes on the State of Virginia in 1785, unquestionably affected his behavior. His belief in the inferiority of blacks, coupled with their presumed resentment of their former owners, made their removal from the United States an integral part of Jefferson's emancipation scheme. These convictions were exacerbated by the bloody revolution in Haiti and an aborted rebellion of slaves and free blacks in Virginia in 1800.

While slavery remained the law of the land, Jefferson struggled to make ownership of humans compatible with the new ideas of the era of revolutions. By creating a moral and social distance between himself and enslaved people, by pushing them down the "scale of beings," he could consider himself as the "father" of "children" who needed his protection. As he wrote of slaves in 1814, "brought up from their infancy without necessity for thought or forecast, [they] are by their habits rendered as incapable as children of taking care of themselves." In the manner of other paternalistic slaveholders, he thus saw himself as the benevolent steward of the African Americans to whom he was bound in a relation of mutual dependency and obligation.

By 1820, during the political crisis that resulted in the Missouri Compromise, Jefferson had come to believe that the spread of slavery into the west&—its "diffusion"&—would prove beneficial to the slaves and hasten the end of the institution. The prospect of a geographical line based on principle running across the country, "like a fire bell in the night, awakened and filled me with terror." He feared it could threaten the union and lead to civil war. As always, his primary concern was the stability of the nation he had helped to found. Almost forty years after Jefferson's death, slavery was ended by the bloodiest war in American history.

Footnotes

1. This article is drawn from Getting Word; composed by Lucia Stanton, February 2008.

Further Sources

Body image insertion
General body image(s): 
TEST

Comments

says

The comment: "I imagine Jefferson was against slavery, but he didn't want to inflict his morality upon others" seems to show how hard it is for some people to face the facts. No doubt he didnt want to inflict it on his slaves! The fact is he spoke consistently against slavery, but the fact is also that he did nothing about it and benefitted from it all his life. He fell short of his own lofty ideals, but many of us are equally guilty of that. He was a flawed human being. Join the club.

says

In view of the many undisputed facts about how Jefferson actually behaved in his life, quite apart from the strong possibility that he fathered a child by Sally Hemmings, assertions such as that "Jefferson fought against slavery all his life", which are actually repeated on this web site, are unsustainable. If he was sincere, he would have freed his slaves. He only freed the Hemmings in his will, but no others - why not in his will? He benefitted all his life from slavery and took no action to disengage from it. Monticello was built through the profits of the labour of his slaves. There is proof that he sought to recover escaped slaves and that slaves were beaten on his plantaion and that family members were sold away. These facts are no doubt uncomfortable, but one does not study history to reinforce existing more comfortable conclusions. You cannot judge him solely by his words.

says

The more I learn about Thomas Jefferson and slavery the more I feel I cannot give him the benefit of the doubt on this issue any longer. Because he wrote the Declaration of Independence, because he was looked up to, because he was looked upon to do the right thing when his neighbors freed their slaves, he must be held to a higher standard, because he was Thomas Jefferson. I cannot think of any reason why he did not free his slaves despite the existence of the "Peculiar Institution", especially Sally Hemmings, in his time. Who knows, he could have led a credible abolitionist movement. What we do know is that he chose to do nothing.

says

I imagine Jefferson was against slavery, but he didn't want to inflict his morality upon others.

says

It's discouraging when publications like the Smithsonian choose to post articles in a manner that leads one to believe they are "fact" simply because they were written by a historian. Like anyone else, historian's can also be full of opinions and Mr. Wiencek recent work "Master of the Mountain....", from which I believe the Smithsonian article pulled many of it's assumptions, is full of such opinions....and suggestions....and theories...etc. Having read both Mr. Wiencek's book, as well as the Smithsonian article, I believe it's fair to say that Mr. Wiencek is no fan of Thomas Jefferson.

However, as Dr. Dierksheide stated, nothing that he presents - either in the article, or in his recent book - is new information. Historians have written for years about the treatment of some of the slaves at Monticello for years. And also as the Dr. points out, there are many contradictions - at least on the surface - between the opinion that Jefferson conveyed in his writings against slavery, and the fact that his home was indeed an estate who's operation was dependent on the backs of many slave laborers. But obviously no one, including Mr. Wiencek, can truly know what Jefferson's personal thoughts and feelings were with regards to anything - let alone the issue of slavery. All one can do is take the man's writings - his own words - and try to glean some sort of insight into what he likely believed and thought about a given subject. Taken in that context, I believe it's historically accurate to say that Jefferson fought against slavery his entire life. From the original draft of the declaration of independence to his support of the elimination of slavery in the Western Territories. As a slave owner, a stance such as this would have done him no good. Yet this was his stance.

As far as his ownership of slaves goes, it's important to keep in context the time in which he lived. There were legal restrictions on the freeing of slaves, and Jefferson also struggled to manage very large debts. One did not simply free slaves at that time by walking up to them and telling them they are free to go. There was a financial burden to be had, both in the release of a slave, as well as the labor loss that would be incurred on these types of plantations - let alone a plantation that carried an enormous amount of debt. Yet regardless of what Jefferson did, or did not do regarding the operation of Monticello, it's important to keep in mind that Thomas Jefferson never once defended the institution of slavery. Not once. That's a lot more than can be said of other men on political power during that time. It was a terrible problem that he did indeed struggled with, as did many of the founding fathers of this country.

Jefferson's reasons as to why he did, or did not do, certain things are his own. And it's not my place to speculate, nor do I think it's Smithsonian magazine's place to speculate - or at least encourage such speculation. Facts are one thing. Conjecture is another.

It is disappointing to see a historian such as Mr. Wiencek conjecture and speculate, while not enlightening anyone as to any new facts. It is also disappointing, yet not surprising, that the Smithsonian would present such an article as fact and truth....and then readers of that article would feel compelled to "protest" the information that the Monticello historians have objectively put forth about Mr Jefferson, through years and years of factual research. It seems all that is necessary nowadays, is to print something in a magazine, put it on TV, and voila - it must be the truth of the matter. I hope that mindset does not continue to be the case. I believe all of the individuals who founded this country, and forged it's constitution, deserve a little more respect - and dare I say, benefit of the doubt, than an article in a magazine - full of recycled information - might grant them.

says

Dear Sir/Madam,

I must write to respectively protest against this page's generally positive portrayal of Jefferson's views and actions regarding slavery. It is simply facetious to argue without reservation that "Jefferson’s belief in the necessity of ending slavery never changed."

New research does not support this claim. I urge you to read the October 2012 article in Smithsonian magazine, "The Dark Side of Thomas Jefferson" which discusses evidence showing the widespread use of forced child labor, whipping of enslaved children, and selling of slaves at Monticello. Jefferson's own recognition of the profit that slavery personally accrued to him is, apparently, proven by his own correspondence:

"I allow nothing for losses by death, but, on the contrary, shall presently take credit four per cent. per annum, for their increase over and above keeping up their own numbers.”

The assertion on this page that Jefferson planted wheat and other crops to replace tabacco in order to "To try to erode Virginians’ support for slavery" also can by explained by new profit-making opportunities that these would create.

"Planting wheat required fewer workers than tobacco, leaving a pool of field laborers available for specialized training." (Smithsonian magazine, October 2012)

Therefore, I think it is misleading for Monticello to claim that "Thomas Jefferson was a consistent opponent of slavery his whole life. " The historical record says otherwise.

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history-archaeology/The-Little-Known-Dark-...

says

Dear Mr. Chen,
 
Thank you for your post.  Monticello encourages the free exchange of ideas and welcomes constructive criticism.  It is our mission to give a transparent, authentic, accurate and comprehensive view of Jefferson and slavery.
 
I would encourage you to read the definitive work on slavery at Monticello— "Those Who Labor for My Happiness”: Slavery at Thomas Jefferson’s Monticello—the culmination of 40 years of research by Lucia Stanton, Shannon Senior Historian Emeritus at Monticello.
 
The “new research” you cite in your post is actually not new; all primary sources presented in this Smithsonian article are in the public domain. 
 
What the historical record does show is this:

  • Jefferson was a man who struggled over the question of slavery and the reality of slave-owning his whole life.
  • Though he called slavery a "hideous blot," he owned 607 human beings in his lifetime.
  • Though he thought that all people were entitled to personal freedom, this ideal was always in conflict with the realities of slave ownership.
  • While Jefferson expressed "scruples" at selling slaves, he sold over 100 in his lifetime.
  • Although he sought to improve the lives of his slaves, worsening finances prevented him from making significant progress.
  • While he tried to reduce cruelty and violence on his plantations, his frequent absences meant that many overseers dealt with slaves harshly.
  • Although Jefferson tried to make money from his diversified agricultural pursuits, the reality was that his slaves were his most valuable asset.

For a fuller discussion of Jefferson’s treatment of his slaves, please refer to the following Monticello webpages:
http://www.monticello.org/mulberry-row/topics/treatment
http://www.monticello.org/mulberry-row/topics/economy
http://www.monticello.org/site/plantation-and-slavery/property
 
Sincerely yours,
Dr. Christa Dierksheide
Historian
Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Monticello

says

Thank you for that, Dr. Dierksheide. It speaks highly of the Thomas Jefferson Foundation, Monticello and your commitment to dispassionate historical research that the book was published by the Foundation.

says

Dear Dr. Dierksheide (and Ms. Berkes),

Thank you for your considerate and candid replies. I certainly recognize the complexity of this topic given Jefferson's mixed legacy at Monticello.

Noting your observation that the Smithsonian article's sources exist in the public domain, I was alluding to the Smithsonian author Henry Wiencik's contention that the "full text" of a letter between Col. Randolph and Jefferson allegedly "[...] did not emerge in print until 2005."

Lastly, I appreciate your recommendations for further reading and research.

Sincerely,
Matthew Chen

says

This is a very difficult topic, and one that many have struggled to understand for a very long time now. This page offers an excellent point to start examining this subject. The text is freshly written by Cinder Stanton, our Shannon Senior Research Historian, and you'll find a link on the right to a page that collects Jefferson's writings on slavery and emancipation. Lastly, the "Further Sources" section at the bottom lists Cinder's own recommendations for exploring this topic further.