On a windy evening at Monticello, Thomas Slaughter,
author and professor of history at the University of Notre Dame,
gave an "entertaining, witty, and consequential" analysis
of how the journals were created and what their authors might
have been trying to accomplish (from May 13, 2003).
(Talk sponsored by McLean Faulconer, Inc.)
PART I: "A problem not fully
appreciated " (3:28)
Professor Slaughter provides a first clue that the journals
are not always what they profess to be.
PART II: "Just so you think I might know
what I'm talking about" (3:52)
Mr. Slaughter gives two more examples of why the journals
should not always be taken at face value.
PART IV: "Time,
part 2" (4:26)
The discussion continues with evidence of how the authors
often added to earlier entries and lost track of days and
dates.
PART VI: A long "chain of communication"
(3:19)
Mr. Slaughter describes the complex chain of communication
with Native American Indians along the trail and how it
was portrayed in the journals.