Search the Encyclopedia
Notes on the State of Virginia
Thomas Jefferson spent part of nearly each day of his adult life penning documents, notes, memoranda, and letters to correspondents in this country and abroad. The letters numbered in the tens of thousands. His meticulously kept memorandum books recorded financial dealings, weather, and miscellaneous events over a sixty-year period. Yet, the Founding Father wrote only one full-length book, Notes on the State of Virginia, a book he neither originally intended to write, nor when completed, to publish widely or even under his own name. It was, in a manner of speaking, a “cultural accident.”
This accidental creation has been called the “best single statement of Jefferson’s principles, the best reflection of his wide-ranging tasks and talents,” and “one of the most important literary and philosophical achievements of the eighteenth-century American mind.” In perhaps a bit of hyperbole, it was claimed to contain “everything that could be said or known about Virginia in the last quarter of the eighteenth century.”
Yet Jefferson’s work was not without controversy. William Peden writes:
In the Notes on Virginia Jefferson at one time or another criticizes most of the vested interests of his time. He attacks the assumptions and usurpation of power by the rich, the powerful, and the well born; the tyranny of the church; the dogmas of the schoolmen; the bigotry of the man on horseback; the enslavement of man by man; the injustice of racial superiority.
Jefferson was well aware that some of his ideas would not sit well with his readers. He worried “whether their publication would do most harm or good.” Of particular concern were his views on slavery and the Virginia state constitution:
It is possible that in my own country these strictures might produce an irritation which would indispose the people towards the two great objects I have in view, that is the emancipation of their slaves, and the settlement of their constitution on a firmer and more permanent basis.
James Madison agreed that Jefferson’s “opinions will displease their respective abettors,” but on the whole the work was “too valuable not to be made known.”
The origin of Notes was a request for information about Virginia made to members of the Continental Congress by the secretary to the French legation in Philadelphia, François Marbois. Jefferson received the request indirectly, in late summer of 1780, from Joseph Jones, a member of the Virginia delegation to the Congress. Jones believed the thirty-seven year-old Jefferson, then governor of Virginia, the person best suited to answer the queries.
Although the country was in the throes of revolution, Jefferson apparently began writing soon after receiving the list of queries, and in November reported he was busily occupied with the task. However, in the ensuing months the war in Virginia took a turn for the worse, and Jefferson’s duties as governor took precedence. In the spring of 1781, he experienced the loss of his young daughter, Lucy Elizabeth.
As Jefferson’s term as governor neared completion in the summer of 1781, the Virginia legislature fled west to Charlottesville in order to escape the invading British. General Cornwallis sent a detachment of dragoons under the command of Lieutenant Colonel Banastre Tarleton to chase down the legislators and, if possible, capture Governor Jefferson, who had taken refuge at Monticello. Warned of the British approach, Jefferson escaped to his Bedford County retreat at Poplar Forest in southwest Virginia. While there, he suffered a fall from a horse that curtailed his movement. During this three-to-four-week confinement at Poplar Forest, Jefferson produced much of his reply to Marbois, which he sent to the French legate in December.
The manuscript sent to Marbois was not the same as that which Jefferson would later submit to a French printer in 1785. According to Douglas Wilson, Jefferson’s responses “while no doubt ripe with Jefferson’s extensive personal knowledge and impression, were not the result of extensive research, . . . it is even possible that the material he sent in December was restricted to a subset of Marbois’s questions.” His reply to Marbois was merely the “starting point” for what would become the final work,  a “stimulus” for what was to follow.
Marbois had prepared a list of twenty-two queries, which one historian characterized as a “jumble” due to their haphazard organization. Jefferson “sorted and arranged the whole under twenty-three heads, the order proceeding from the natural through the civil to the generally social and moral.” By far the longest response was found in Query VI: Productions Mineral, Vegetable and Animal. In this section Jefferson attacked the theories of the French naturalists (Voltaire, Abbé Raynal, D’Auberton, and especially Buffon), who frequently cast Jefferson’s native land in an unfavorable light and in other ways were simply wrong. Jefferson “set up thirty-one false premises of the French naturalists and meticulously refuted each one.”
Although extolling the virtues of America’s Indians in Query XI: Aborigines, Jefferson argues in Query XIV: Laws that the Negro is inferior to both whites and Indians. His denigration of blacks in the harshest terms is the most unsettling of Jefferson’s views and has earned the most serious criticism. In Query XIII: Constitution and XIV: Laws, Jefferson develops the “central rationale of an American polity based upon charters, constitutions, and the laws of the state,“ as well as delivering his explanation of the Revolution. He continues in later sections to build on his “fundamental assertions of republicanism,” providing recommendations for education, manufacture, religion and manners.
Jefferson relied on many historical and philosophical texts, as well as reports from a host of correspondents when composing Notes. His knowledge of river systems and Indian tribes to the west, for example, was supplemented by information provided by the geographer Thomas Hutchins. Descriptions of animals came from various friends, including Dr. Thomas Walker, Archibald Cary, and George Rogers Clark. Charles Thomson produced such extensive commentary on Indians that Jefferson added it to the published Notes as an appendix. This secondary information became entwined with the myriad observations, interviews, and other original research conducted by Jefferson.
By the spring of 1784, more than two years after he replied to Marbois, the manuscript had swelled to “treble bulk.” When Jefferson contacted a publisher in Philadelphia prior to this departure to France, he found the cost of publication more than he wanted to pay. He took the manuscript to Paris where he contracted with Philippe Denis Pierres to print 200 copies, which he received in May of 1785.
Once Notes was published, Jefferson was unsure of the next step. He wrote to James Madison asking him to read it carefully and to discuss it in confidence with “those whose judgments and information you pay respect to. If you think it will give no offence I will send a copy to each of the students of W.M.C. and some others to my friends.” Should the opinion of his American colleagues be negative, Jefferson suggested he would “burn the rest.”
In Paris, Jefferson “gave out a few copies only, and to confidential persons, writing in every copy a restraint against it’s publication.” Nevertheless, a copy fell into the hands of a bookseller who, according to Jefferson, “employed a hireling translator and was about publishing it in the most injurious form possible.”  To rescue his work, Jefferson entered into an agreement for the translation into French with the highly respected writer, Abbé Morellet. Unfortunately, the author and this new translator did not see eye to eye. Dorothy Medlin writes:
Apparently Jefferson did not realize that he and Morellet had very different attitudes toward translation. In Jefferson’s opinion, a good translation was a strictly literal rendering of the original text ... In Morellet’s opinion, the translator was an active collaborator in the dissemination of liberal ideas to a reading public, which appreciated classical order, clarity, and stylistic elegance.
Consequently, when Jefferson saw the completed work, he was seriously displeased with the translation.
Jefferson then turned to the English publisher John Stockdale, to whom he promised to send a corrected copy if “you chuse to print the work.”  Stockdale agreed to print Notes, although not before stating, “I know there is some bitter Pills relative to our Country.”  On August 14, 1787, Jefferson wrote to Stockdale that he had received the initial copies.
The bibliographer, Coolie Verner, tracked the distribution of the original Stockdale edition and noted the various modifications made by Jefferson and others on these copies. Notes appeared in some nineteen editions during Jefferson's lifetime (and not always with his knowledge). In 1788 the first American edition was published in Philadelphia “from a pirate copy of the Stockdale edition.”
Jefferson made numerous corrections and changes in his personal copy with every intention of eventually revising his work. His personal, annotated copy became part of his estate and with permission of his executor, Thomas Jefferson Randolph, an edition was published in Richmond in 1853 incorporating Jefferson's notes and corrections.
The task of revision would be left to another generation. Jefferson judged his work as “nothing more than the measure of a shadow, never stationary, but lengthening as the sun advances, and to be taken anew from hour to hour. it must remain therefore for some other hand to sketch it's appearance at another epoch.” 
- Gene Zechmeister, 12/20/13
- Jefferson, Thomas. Notes on the State of Virginia. London: Stockdale, 1787. Jefferson's personal copy of the 1787 edition of Notes, housed in the Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library at the University of Virginia. Digital images of this book are also available.
- Kimball, Marie. Jefferson, War and Peace, 1776 to 1784. New York: Coward-McCann, 1947. See especially pp. 262-305.
- Massachusetts Historical Society. Thomas Jefferson Papers: An Electronic Archive. Notes on the State of Virginia. Browse digital images of Jefferson's manuscript copy of Notes on the State of Virginia, and view additional related documents.
- Peterson, Merrill D. “Thomas Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia.” In Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, vol. 7, ed. Roseann Runte, 49-62. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978.
- Wilson, Douglas L. “The Evolution of Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia.” Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 112 (2004):98-133.
- 1. Merrill D. Peterson, “Thomas Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia,” in Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, vol. 7, ed. Roseann Runte (Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1978), 50.
- 2. Notes, ed. Peden, v.
- 3. Peterson, 1978, 61.
- 4. Marie Kimball, Jefferson, War and Peace, 1776 to 1784 (New York: Coward-McCann, 1947), 263.
- 5. Notes, ed. Peden, xxiii.
- 6. Jefferson to Chastellux, June 7, 1785, in PTJ, 8:184. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 7. Madison to Jefferson, November 15, 1785, in ibid., 9:38. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 8. Notes, ed. Peden, xii.
- 9. Jefferson to D’Anmours, Nov 30, 1780, in PTJ, 4:168. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 10. Douglas L. Wilson, “The Evolution of Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia,” Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 112 (2004):104. See also: TJ to Marbois, Mar 4, 1781, in PTJ, 5:58. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 11. Wilson, 105, 108. See also Jefferson to Marbois, December 20, 1781, in PTJ, 6: 141-142. Transcription available at Founders Online. Note: The manuscript was delayed reaching Marbois, and did not arrive until late spring of 1782. See Jefferson to Marbois, March 24, 1782, in PTJ, 6:171-172. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 12. Wilson, 108.
- 13. Peterson, 1978, 52.
- 14. Kimball, 263.
- 15. Merrill D. Peterson, Thomas Jefferson and the New Nation: A Biography (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970), 250.
- 16. Ibid.
- 17. Ruth Henline, “A Study of Notes on the State of Virginia as an Evidence of Jefferson’s Reaction Against the Theories of the French Naturalists,” Virginia Magazine of History and Biography 55 (1947): 245. See also Notes, ed. Peden, 268, n.28.
- 18. Robert A. Ferguson, “Mysterious Obligation: Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia,” American Literature 52 (1980): 397, 398.
- 19. Kimball, 267. See also Notes, ed. Peden, xv, n.12, 10, 102. Kimball provides an extensive list of texts and persons Jefferson consulted.
- 20. Jefferson to Thomas Walker, September 25, 1783, in PTJ, 6:339-340. See editor’s note, 340. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 21. Archibald Cary to Jefferson, October 12, 1783, in PTJ, 6:342-345. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 22. Jefferson to George Rogers Clark, December 19, 1781, in PTJ , 6:139. Transcription available at Founders Online; George Rogers Clark to Jefferson, February 20, 1782, in PTJ, 6:159-160. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 23. Notes, ed. Peden, 296 n.1.
- 24. Jefferson to Chastellux, January 16, 1784, in PTJ, 6:467. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 25. Jefferson, Autobiography, in Peterson, Writings, 55.
- 26. Coolie Verner, “Mr. Jefferson Distributes His Notes,” Bulletin of the New York Public Library 56 (1952): 3; see also MB, 1:591. The manuscript copy which served as the setting copy for the 1785 Paris edition is part of the Coolidge Collection of Thomas Jefferson Papers at the Massachusetts Historical Society.
- 27. Jefferson to James Madison, May 11, 1785, in PTJ, 8:147-148. Transcription available at Founders Online. Madison reported that George Wythe suggested copies should be placed in the William and Mary College library rather than given to all students; see Madison to Jefferson, November 15, 1785, in PTJ , 9:38. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 28. Jefferson to James Madison, February 8, 1786, in PTJ, 9:265. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 29. Ibid.
- 30. Dorothy Medlin, “Thomas Jefferson, André Morellet, and the French Version of Notes on the State of Virginia,” William and Mary Quarterly 35 (1978): 88.
- 31. Ibid., 91. There is more to this story. Jefferson, for instance, was too busy with affairs of state to respond promptly to Morellet’s drafts, and other problems outside of Morellet’s control also arose. Medlin is rather sympathetic to the position in which Morellet was placed.
- 32. Jefferson to Stockdale, February 1, 1787, in PTJ , 11:107. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 33. Stockdale to Jefferson, February 13, 1787, in PTJ, 11:143. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 34. Jefferson to Stockdale, August 14, 1787, in PTJ, 12:35. Transcription available at Founders Online.
- 35. Verner (1952), 3.
- 36. Coolie Verner, A Further Checklist of the Separate Editions of Jefferson’s Notes on the State of Virginia (Charlottesville, VA: Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia, 1950), 9. NOTE: Jefferson’s personal copy, with corrections and additions, is in the Albert and Shirley Small Special Collections Library at the University of Virginia.
- 37. Jefferson to John W. Campbell, September 3, 1809, in PTJ:RS, 1:486. Transcription available at Founders Online.
Nevertheless, by 1810 he had abandoned the thought of revision. He considered a revision “impracticable” at his stage of life, suggesting the additional forty years engaged “in the affairs of mankind would lead me into dilations ending I know not where.” (Although he did make it clear “that experience indeed has not altered a single principle.”) Jefferson stated that his days were taken up with exercise and other business, as well as “correspondence, the result of the extensive relations which my course of life has necessarily occasioned. and now the act of writing itself is becoming slow, laborious and irksome.” Jefferson to John Melish, December 10, 1814, in PTJ:RS, 8:133-134.
- 38. Notes, ed. Peden, xx. See also Verner (1950), 23.
- 39. Jefferson to John Melish, December 10, 1814, in PTJ:RS, 8:134.